From 2e1dd8e0763939d8ebe169cc8581fa906cbb4f89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vladimír Čunát Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 13:54:20 +0100 Subject: recutils: supply the forgotten patch --- pkgs/tools/misc/recutils/glibc.patch | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) create mode 100644 pkgs/tools/misc/recutils/glibc.patch (limited to 'pkgs/tools/misc/recutils') diff --git a/pkgs/tools/misc/recutils/glibc.patch b/pkgs/tools/misc/recutils/glibc.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..8b4997f099de --- /dev/null +++ b/pkgs/tools/misc/recutils/glibc.patch @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +--- recutils-1.5/lib/stdio.in.h ++++ recutils-1.5/lib/stdio.in.h +@@ -699,22 +699,11 @@ + # endif + #endif + +-#if @GNULIB_GETS@ +-# if @REPLACE_STDIO_READ_FUNCS@ && @GNULIB_STDIO_H_NONBLOCKING@ +-# if !(defined __cplusplus && defined GNULIB_NAMESPACE) +-# undef gets +-# define gets rpl_gets +-# endif +-_GL_FUNCDECL_RPL (gets, char *, (char *s) _GL_ARG_NONNULL ((1))); +-_GL_CXXALIAS_RPL (gets, char *, (char *s)); +-# else +-_GL_CXXALIAS_SYS (gets, char *, (char *s)); +-# undef gets +-# endif +-_GL_CXXALIASWARN (gets); + /* It is very rare that the developer ever has full control of stdin, +- so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning. Assume it is +- always declared, since it is required by C89. */ ++ so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning; besides, C11 ++ removed it. */ ++#undef gets ++#if HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS + _GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead"); + #endif + -- cgit 1.4.1