| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
http://hydra.nixos.org/build/24983009
|
| |
|
|
| |
http://hydra.nixos.org/build/24982682
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Hopefully fixes random failures like
http://hydra.nixos.org/build/24861987/nixlog/446
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We no longer need have "SUID sandbox" enabled in the chrome://sandbox
status page and we now also check for "You are adequately sandboxed." to
be absolutely sure that we're running with proper sandboxing.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will make the test a lot more reliable, because we no longer need
to press ESC multiple times hoping that it will close the popup.
Unfortunately in order to run this test I needed to locally revert the
gyp update from a305e6855dd8723683c77635f45ae28411c8f36c.
With the old gyp version however the test runs fine and it's able to
properly detect the popup.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's not nice to send the escape key over and over again just to ensure
the popup is closed, because even *if* it fails to close the popup 4
times in a row it's just very unlikely that it will be closed. But in
order to make really sure, we might need to do a screenshot and detect
visual changes.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since Chromium version 42, we have a new user namespaces sandbox in the
upstream project. It's more integrated so the chrome://sandbox page
reports it as "Namespace Sandbox" instead of SUID sandbox, which we were
re-using (or abusing?) in our patch.
So if either "SUID Sandbox" or "Namespace Sandbox" reports with "Yes",
it's fine on our side.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Chromium is quite memory hungry and we frequently get random crashes in
the tests, so let's set it to 1024 MB because new releases of Chromium
most probably won't consume *less* memory.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Of course, this could be done via packageOverrides, but this is more
explicit and makes it possible to run the tests with various Chromium
overrides.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|
|
|
Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and
even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as
root.
But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing
windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as
possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool
keystrokes.
And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least
whether Chromium works _at_all_.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
|