| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
... | |
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| |_|/ /
|/| | | |
Nat port forwarding ranges
|
| | | | |
|
|/ / / |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Adds missing documentation for copyFileFromHost in NixOS tests
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
user-mgmt.xml: extraUsers => users
|
| |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Changed extraUsers -> users and one case of extraGroups -> groups in nixos manual chapter 7.
According to chatter on IRC these are the proper names for these configuration options nowadays.
Modified based on feedback from Jörg Talheim.
|
|/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Previously only the line numbers of a giant, internally generated XML file were
printed, without any kind of debuggability.
Now at least the mentioned lines are printed with a little bit of surrounding
context (to have something to grep for).
```
manual-combined.xml:4863: element para: Relax-NG validity error : Did not expect element para there
4859 <chapter xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" version="5.0" xml:id="sec-writing-modules">
4860
4861 <title>Writing NixOS Modules</title>
4862
4863 <para>NixOS has a modular system for declarative configuration. This
4864 system combines multiple <emphasis>modules</emphasis> to produce the
4865 full system configuration. One of the modules that constitute the
```
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Since ssh-dss is no longer supported by default, users relying on those
keys for their login may be locked out. They should ideally use stronger
keys, but adding the support for ssh-dss back in can also be done
through extraConfig.
|
|\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| | |
services.xserver: fix defaults of X11
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
manager is not "none"""
This reverts commit e64dc2543458b52abcd913bad87851f5d7db435d.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
For values that are positive, but cannot be 0.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Synchronize the manual for the new types.
|
|/ /
| |
| |
| | |
An int type that checks the value range.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
not "none""
This reverts commit 93c54acf97077567e8d6135a36f191e872b26692.
This reopens #30517 @nbp @Ma27
Breaking people's config for this is hardly reasonable as is. If it
absolutely cannot be avoided, at the very least, we need to provide
clear instructions on what people need to upgrade in their config. I
actually had to bisect to the commit, to even find out what property I
should change or define, as the error message was useless. It didn't
even mention a property name.
Discussion on the PR seems to be ongoing, so I'm reverting this, so we
don't break people's systems on unstable.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
resolves #11064
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
postage is no longer maintained and has been replaced by the identical pgmanage. See:
https://github.com/workflowproducts/postage#postage-has-been-replaced-with-pgmanage
The following error is raised when a user enables the deprecated `services.postage.enable` option:
Failed assertions:
- services.postage is deprecated in favor of pgmanage. They have the same options so just substitute postage for pgmanage.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of improving #30760: users on a serial console can't switch ttys,
so providing another method to access the manual is useful.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #29197.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit ea6d37c2bba277295e7a70d0a4f5871a99f7c451.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
see #29516
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I didn't notice the cherry-pick, but Globin found out immediately.
/cc #29180.
|
|
|
|
| |
/cc #29180.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Documents a possible migration step required to use the new options.
|
|
|
|
| |
This also provides an example of how to migrate.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* NixOS Manual: document assertions and warnings
* NixOS manual: re-wrap assertions text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The section was strange to read, as the initial example already used
`listOf' which is mentioned in the very first paragraph. Then you read
in a subsection about `listOf' and the exact same example is given
once again.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|