| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| | |
fetchFromGitiles: init
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This has the same motivation as fetchFromGitHub/fetchFromGitLab --
it's cheaper to download a tarball of a single revision than it is to
download a whole history.
I could have gone with domain/group/repo, like fetchFromGitLab, but it
would have made implementation more difficult, and this syntax means
it's a drop-in replacement for fetchgit, so I decided it wasn't worth
it.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We shouldn’t force the user to have a C compiler in scope, just
because the derivation is forced to build locally. That can’t be
counted as “lightweight” anymore.
Co-Authored-By: Silvan Mosberger<contact@infinisil.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This makes it possible to reference single function definitions,
for pointing people to their exact definition.
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
| |
The link in the note points to the `id` added in
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/3255, so it might take some time to
start working correctly.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
In my opinion Functions should only contain pure functions. These are
both meant to provide derivations so I put them under Builders. Don't
know exactly *where* to put them so "special" it is...
|
| | |
|
| |
|