about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* .github: remove cc from pull-request templateIngolf Wagner2020-01-03
|
* nixpkgs-review: 2.1.0 -> 2.1.1Jörg Thalheim2019-12-22
| | | | changelog: https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review/releases/tag/2.1.1
* .github: clarify things done re: sandboxingAmerico2019-10-30
| | | | | | | | | | | Per https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/58147#issuecomment-478234495 sandboxing is not fully functional on macOS. .github: specify where sandboxing can be run Co-Authored-By: Jon <jonringer@users.noreply.github.com> .github: remove macOS note
* Fix link in PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (the same link)Vladimír Čunát2019-10-28
|
* PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: Add "Notify maintainers" sectionSteven Shaw2019-07-30
|
* PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: "Assured whether" -> "Ensured that"Craig Hall2019-07-01
|
* Merge pull request #58098 from Infinisil/encouraging_reviewsworldofpeace2019-04-04
|\ | | | | PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: Add encouragement to review PRs
| * PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: Add encouragement to review PRsSilvan Mosberger2019-03-28
| |
* | doc/reviewing-contributions: nix-review instead of nox-reviewJörg Thalheim2019-03-20
|/ | | | | It is faster, handles more edge cases and allows to test/review the built packages interactively.
* PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: Ask for docsNiklas Hambüchen2018-11-22
|
* PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md: Ask for closure size impactEelco Dolstra2018-06-21
|
* use sandbox instead of build-use-sandboxBob van der Linden2018-05-30
|
* pr template: make values of platform field less ambiguousMaxime Dénès2017-10-09
|
* pr template: make formatting consistentPiotr Bogdan2017-09-03
|
* Pull request template: comment out instructionsLinus Heckemann2017-08-12
|
* PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md: mereley -> merelyYegor Timoshenko2017-07-28
|
* Pull request template: clarify the purpose of the templateFrederik Rietdijk2017-07-22
|
* github/pr-template: Add note about NixOS testsaszlig2017-06-23
| | | | | | | | | | | On several occasions I've seen people bumping packages which have NixOS tests but without actually running them. While this probably won't prevent such occasions entirely, at least it serves as an additional checklist item so contributors don't forget about these tests. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
* Update PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.mdIgnat Loskutov2016-11-04
| | | Follow the rebranding of OS X into macOS
* PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: rename chroot to sandboxRushmore Mushambi2016-09-02
| | | See https://github.com/NixOS/nix/commit/b39622a487e2978bd32c9faf2f651aec1f9815c1
* PR template: go back to old option name for nowVladimír Čunát2016-06-29
| | | | | The old one works on all nix(os) versions, whereas the new one doesn't work e.g. on default 16.03 setting. Discussed on #15112.
* Update PR template with motivation for changesDaniel Peebles2016-05-24
| | | I'm seeing a lot of PRs that only include the checklist, when the main thing I care about when I'm reviewing a PR is what the author was thinking when they decided to make the change.
* github PR template: reformulate the sandboxing helpVladimír Čunát2016-04-26
| | | | | | | It's been reported that when running through nix daemon, sandboxing can't be turned on by passing `--option` (silently ignored), so let's not suggest that way. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/14866#issuecomment-214619909
* nixos: rename chroot* to sandbox*Vladimír Čunát2016-04-25
| | | | | On Nix side this was done months ago: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/682
* Simplify contributingzimbatm2016-04-09
| | | | | * Highlight the top mistakes directly in CONTRIBUTING.md * Remove unecessary cruft from the PR template
* .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md: use individual checkboxes for tested OSesNathan Zadoks2016-03-16
|
* PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: fix issues raised in 3c84ae406Domen Kožar2016-02-28
|
* PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md: clarify a few thingsDomen Kožar2016-02-28
|
* PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: initArseniy Seroka2016-02-22