summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/nixos/modules/system
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndreas Rammhold <andreas@rammhold.de>2018-01-31 17:50:10 +0100
committerRok Garbas <rok@garbas.si>2018-02-01 12:54:02 +0100
commitce08581088897860dd3b7b510f30b093095592f3 (patch)
tree0fac3b89c8ba3e18f2d360fe095b626db543bd81 /nixos/modules/system
parent57d72d41407c665eca776f783f1b35641dd030bd (diff)
downloadnixlib-ce08581088897860dd3b7b510f30b093095592f3.tar
nixlib-ce08581088897860dd3b7b510f30b093095592f3.tar.gz
nixlib-ce08581088897860dd3b7b510f30b093095592f3.tar.bz2
nixlib-ce08581088897860dd3b7b510f30b093095592f3.tar.lz
nixlib-ce08581088897860dd3b7b510f30b093095592f3.tar.xz
nixlib-ce08581088897860dd3b7b510f30b093095592f3.tar.zst
nixlib-ce08581088897860dd3b7b510f30b093095592f3.zip
firefox: enable official branding
As stated by Sylvestre Ledru (@sylvestre) on Nov 22, 2017 at
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/31843#issuecomment-346372756 we
have permission to use the official firefox branding.

Fur purposes of documentation the statement of @sylvestre:
> As the person who did part of the work described in the LWN article
> and release manager working for Mozilla, I can confirm the statement
> that I made in
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815006
>
> @garbas shared with me the list of patches applied for the Nix package.
> As they are just for portability and tiny modifications, they don't
> alter the experience of the product. In parallel, Rok also shared the
> build options. They seem good (even if I cannot judge the quality of the
> packaging of the underlying dependencies like sqlite, png, etc).
> Therefor, as long as you keep the patch queue sane and you don't alter
> the experience of Firefox users, you won't have any issues using the
> official branding.
Diffstat (limited to 'nixos/modules/system')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions